Rangers Not a Good Bang for Their Buck
ESPN.com takes a look at who's getting the biggest and smallest bangs for their bucks in the NHL.
After comparing teams by player payroll dollars spent per regular-season victory.the Rangers can back as the 21st best (or worst) bang for our buck in the NHL...
21. Rangers - Payroll: $59.93 million, Projected Point: 96, Cost per Point: $624K
Rangers are paying Wade Redden $6.5M -- not included in payroll -- to play for their farm team in Hartford.
Cap Geek has the Rangers current payroll as $56.65 million making their cost per point $590K.
...great research fellas. Also how can they even mention Wade Redden when he's not on the team and , as they mention, his salary isn't included in the payroll.
Remember to follow me on Twitter & Facebook or e-mail me at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. .
After comparing teams by player payroll dollars spent per regular-season victory.the Rangers can back as the 21st best (or worst) bang for our buck in the NHL...
21. Rangers - Payroll: $59.93 million, Projected Point: 96, Cost per Point: $624K
Rangers are paying Wade Redden $6.5M -- not included in payroll -- to play for their farm team in Hartford.
Cap Geek has the Rangers current payroll as $56.65 million making their cost per point $590K.
...great research fellas. Also how can they even mention Wade Redden when he's not on the team and , as they mention, his salary isn't included in the payroll.
Remember to follow me on Twitter & Facebook or e-mail me at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. .
