Sabres, Wild & Rangers Could Be Adversely Affected by New CBA the Most

Written by James Wrabel on .

James O'Brien of Pro Hockey Talk breaks down a report courtesy of Craig Custance of ESPN in which teams would be in salary cap hell if the owners get the CBA in their model, which would lower the salary cap from $70 million to around $54 million. 

Here is the breakdown for the New York Rangers:

Rangers: Would be $13.1M above $54M.

  • Custance assumes that New York would need to buy out Chris Drury and Wade Redden.
  • Like Myers, Custance points out that Brad Richards will make a Myers-like $12M.
Custance also talks about appropriate punishment for teams who have signed players to deals that "circumvent the cap," including applying the salary each season, rather than the average of the salary, or using the average of the first five seasons as possibilities in the new CBA. 
  • Do Custance and O'Brien realize the Rangers already bought out Chris Drury last offseason? Bad job by ESPN on hockey...once again.
  • No one likes to mention it, but Brad Richards' deal does follow the slick ways of prior long-term, front-loaded contracts around the league and, if the NHL does plan on doing something about it with this CBA, it will be interesting to see what Sather does about it.

Give a follow on Twitter @TheWrage or Facebook. E-mail me with any questions or comments at  This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
8 comments
jnyfive
jnyfive

So, if there is a supposed 24% rollback plus a reduction in the salary cap then everything should cancel out. Also, why would teams agree to the potential cap hits without putting in some kind of a grandfather clause for certain contracts?

Ranger Dave
Ranger Dave

Don't have to buyout redden as his contract counts against the offseason inflated camp but once a new cba is in place he will be sent to Hartford and cleared off the regular season rangers roster and won't count against the salary cap. However if we buy him out the buyout will register against the regular season cap for the next four years. That Custance guy is a joke.

mick96
mick96

What I'm worried about besides not having a season is how this will affect our ability to resign our rfa's next summer.

TheWrage
TheWrage

 @mick96 If the new salary cap is closer to $50 million, the Rangers are going to be in a world of hurt with RFAs. They wont be able to sign all of them, meaning they'll decide which ones they can live without.

 

Here's hoping the cap stays at a high number. 

Ranger Dave
Ranger Dave

@TheWrage @mick96 I don't understand why the owners of teams against the cap would want to lower the cap. Works against everything they have built and gives smaller market teams and cheap owners a major advantage

mick96
mick96

@TheWrage Gotta think at this point sauer would be the odd man out

Medvjed004
Medvjed004

according to capgeek Drury still has a salary cap hit for 2012/2013 season with 1,66 M $.

TheWrage
TheWrage

 @Medvjed004 That's his buyout that goes against the cap. Drury was bought out last season. 

Top Stories

Awful Announcing

Awful Announcing